Father Robinson found Guilty
I wrote about this case earlier and called the evidence against Father Robinson “flimsy”. It was enough, however, for the jury to find him Guilty, so I stand rebuked. Still, when you consider that they found male DNA not only on the nun’s underwear, but under her fingernails (strongly indicating a struggle with her killer) and that it was NOT a match with Father Robinson, you have to wonder … why? The rest of the case was circumstantial, and the hard scientific evidence pointed to someone else. Guilty? (shakes head).