http://defensology.com/2006/04/27/if-the-dna-doesnt-fit-you-must-um-quit/ Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:40:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 http://defensology.com/2006/04/27/if-the-dna-doesnt-fit-you-must-um-quit/#comment-991 Fri, 12 May 2006 03:49:44 +0000 http://defensology.com/2006/04/27/if-the-dna-doesnt-fit-you-must-um-quit/#comment-991 [...] I wrote about this case earlier and called the evidence against Father Robinson “flimsy”. It was enough, however, for the jury to find him Guilty, so I stand rebuked. Still, when you consider that they found male DNA not only on the nun’s underwear, but under her fingernails (strongly indicating a struggle with her killer) and that it was NOT a match with Father Robinson, you have to wonder … why? The rest of the case was circumstantial, and the hard scientific evidence pointed to someone else. Guilty? (shakes head). [...] […] I wrote about this case earlier and called the evidence against Father Robinson “flimsy”. It was enough, however, for the jury to find him Guilty, so I stand rebuked. Still, when you consider that they found male DNA not only on the nun’s underwear, but under her fingernails (strongly indicating a struggle with her killer) and that it was NOT a match with Father Robinson, you have to wonder … why? The rest of the case was circumstantial, and the hard scientific evidence pointed to someone else. Guilty? (shakes head). […]

]]>