<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prosecutor backs down, releases another innocent</title>
	<link>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Prosecutor backs down, releases another innocent by: Josh Gross</title>
		<link>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-38</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 07:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-38</guid>
					<description>I agree with Kate. Except for the termination of employment, personal liability and disbarment parts.  :-\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with Kate. Except for the termination of employment, personal liability and disbarment parts.  :-\
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Prosecutor backs down, releases another innocent by: Kate Westermann</title>
		<link>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2006 18:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>What I want to know is what is going to happen to Mike Carroll, Judy Hunter, Sherri Walsh and the rest of these 'circle-the-wagons' power-drunk bastards?  How anyone can say with a straight face that because perfect evidence (which was not available at the time of the trial) was not used to gain the conviction, that it could not be used for exculpation, just blows my mind.  That's the worst circular argument I've ever heard.

I would get a warm glow from seeing each of them locked in a room and hammered with these questions until they collapse in sobs.  No more supercilious, self-righteous nonsense, no bullet-proof press conferences, no 'no comment' dodges, and no jabs at Petro for breaking ranks.  Just confrontation, followed by termination of employment, personal liability and disbarment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What I want to know is what is going to happen to Mike Carroll, Judy Hunter, Sherri Walsh and the rest of these &#8216;circle-the-wagons&#8217; power-drunk bastards?  How anyone can say with a straight face that because perfect evidence (which was not available at the time of the trial) was not used to gain the conviction, that it could not be used for exculpation, just blows my mind.  That&#8217;s the worst circular argument I&#8217;ve ever heard.</p>
	<p>I would get a warm glow from seeing each of them locked in a room and hammered with these questions until they collapse in sobs.  No more supercilious, self-righteous nonsense, no bullet-proof press conferences, no &#8216;no comment&#8217; dodges, and no jabs at Petro for breaking ranks.  Just confrontation, followed by termination of employment, personal liability and disbarment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Prosecutor backs down, releases another innocent by: Robert Perez</title>
		<link>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-13</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-13</guid>
					<description>Kudos to you, Bob, for your contribution to Clarence's freedom. Can you tell us how he's doing and what the status is of his case at the moment?

RP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Kudos to you, Bob, for your contribution to Clarence&#8217;s freedom. Can you tell us how he&#8217;s doing and what the status is of his case at the moment?</p>
	<p>RP
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Prosecutor backs down, releases another innocent by: Bob Chorba</title>
		<link>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-12</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defensology.com/2005/12/22/prosecutor-backs-down-releases-another-innocent/#comment-12</guid>
					<description>I have been involved in Clarence's case since the FIRST A&amp;#38;E Show (&quot;What the Girl Saw&quot;) appeared about two years ago. I have contributed over $200. to the DNA Fund. I also drove from Milwaukee to Baberton, OH for a memorial Service in June. I have been interviewed on TV and have written numerous E_Mails to help win Clarence's Freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I have been involved in Clarence&#8217;s case since the FIRST A&amp;E Show (&#8221;What the Girl Saw&#8221;) appeared about two years ago. I have contributed over $200. to the DNA Fund. I also drove from Milwaukee to Baberton, OH for a memorial Service in June. I have been interviewed on TV and have written numerous E_Mails to help win Clarence&#8217;s Freedom.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
