<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trust us, you&#8217;re Guilty.</title>
	<link>http://defensology.com/2005/11/05/trust-us-youre-guilty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Trust us, you&#8217;re Guilty. by: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Washington Judge Orders Datamaster Software Code</title>
		<link>http://defensology.com/2005/11/05/trust-us-youre-guilty/#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defensology.com/2005/11/05/trust-us-youre-guilty/#comment-4</guid>
					<description>[...] As I reported here regarding a recent Florida case, the quest to obtain the software code behind the curtain of most breath test machines has started to pick up steam. In some very welcome news, a Washington state judge has now followed suit and issued a subpoena Duces Tecum ordering National Patent (manufacturers of the popular Datamaster) to produce the software code inside their machine. This is an exciting development here in my home state, and I&amp;#8217;ll continue covering the results here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] As I reported here regarding a recent Florida case, the quest to obtain the software code behind the curtain of most breath test machines has started to pick up steam. In some very welcome news, a Washington state judge has now followed suit and issued a subpoena Duces Tecum ordering National Patent (manufacturers of the popular Datamaster) to produce the software code inside their machine. This is an exciting development here in my home state, and I&#8217;ll continue covering the results here. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
